Facebook Live stream of PPV boxing match a wake-up call to industry

By Steve Langdon on Feb 06 2017 at 6:00 AM

This past weekend,  the main Australian subscription TV company, FOXTEL, screened a much-anticipated boxing match on its pay-per-view channel (PPV); the cost of the bout was $60 AUD and it was available to all subscribers regardless of the tier they subscribed to.  There had been a lot of promotion, as you would expect for such a high profile event.

But in the buildup to the fight, two enterprising young Aussies began to LIVE stream what was on their TV screens directly to Facebook through their Facebook LIVE service. This is, of course, illegal, as within your TV contract it clearly states you have purchased a license to watch content in your residential home and not in any means broadcast or further distribute it.  However, stream the fight they did and one even received a telephone call from a FOXTEL representative advising he needed to take down the stream immediately. He recorded the call and placed it on Youtube.

Numbers range up to 300,000 for how many fans watched the fight without having purchased the PPV and, quite rightly, FOXTEL are aggrieved and will certainly take this further.

Taking a step back. this is an extraordinary story, yet one that was bound to happen, ever since the Periscope LIVE viewing of the same fight last year and a few more.   It is a case of new methods of distribution catching up with ingrained business models.

There is no doubt in my mind that it is wrong, you don't sit in a cinema and record a blockbuster and think that is right... this is the same.   

Broadcast rights fund the growth of sport. I did a year-long thesis on the topic and it’s as simple as that. You can argue that the rich sports get richer and the second- and third-tier sports get poorer due to the portioning of TV rights money, but that is for another day.

The real question here is: What next?  

Youtube has a very sophisticated "fingerprint match" that catches content and allows the owner to own and monetize it, or take down the content when they spot something, I have used it myself when I worked on reality TV and clips were being quickly shared. Surely this is something that now needs to be developed for LIVE content across all social media channels?   

From the social media point of view, Facebook states that they have the ability to watch and act on copyrighted content when it reaches a certain viewer threshold, well this one clearly got past, Broadcasters will no doubt try to push Facebook to a degree of ownership of this problem.

Also,  from a subscription broadcaster company point of view, shouldn't it be possible for broadcasters to give access to the public as a "one off" to events like this, so non-subscribers have the chance to get onboard rather than resort to watching via a feed on a social media network? A case in point is the Now TV service here in the United Kingdom that allows viewers without a contract to buy the ability to watch a day's sport or a movie with just a single small payment. What Now TV does well here is that It successfully blends the old business model with new methods of distribution and payment options and that, for me, is the key here. 

The ability to stream is only going to get better and better, 4K phones, powerful broadband and even the ability to insert adverts, so if you can’t beat em, probably time to work out how you can mutually benefit.

This story should be a wake-up call for a few parties, oh and what a terrific time to train to be a media lawyer... tell your teenagers!

Posted in: 

READ THESE NEXT

PPV UFC 214 comes to Sling TV. Will it drive subscriptions?
Live sports, Operators, OTT, Cloud TV
PPV UFC 214 comes to Sling TV. Will it drive subscriptions?
Jul 26 2017 9:30 AM

Sling TV is planning to offer its first-ever pay-per-view (PPV) event, the much anticipated UFC grudge match that features a pair of light heavyweights. UFC 214: Cormier v. Jones 2 features current champ Daniel Cormier against ex-champ Jon Jones who last met in 2015 at UFC 182.

Live sports
Wimbledon 2027: how will fan engagement and marketing change?
Jul 20 2017 3:45 PM

This article originally appeared in The Drum.

Pay TV, Live sports, Millennials
A skinny bundle without sports? Duh
May 25 2017 10:30 AM

Skinny bundles from cable operators – and their OTT surrogates like Sling TV – are becoming more common as the companies try to look more attractive to consumers tired of paying for 200-plus channels when they really only watch a dozen or less. Survey after survey has shown that subscribers are hungry for not just a slimmed down offering but also for the subscription savings smaller bundles would engender.

Live sports
Facebook Live stream of PPV boxing match a wake-up call to industry
Feb 06 2017 6:00 AM

This past weekend,  the main Australian subscription TV company, FOXTEL, screened a much-anticipated boxing match on its pay-per-view channel (PPV); the cost of the bout was $60 AUD and it was available to all subscribers regardless of the tier they subscribed to.  There had been a lot of promotion, as you would expect for such a high profile event.