ESPN sues Verizon over ‘Custom TV’ skinny bundle plan

By Jim O'Neill on Apr 27 2015 at 9:45 AM
ESPN sues Verizon over ‘Custom TV’ skinny bundle plan

Disney has decided to play hardball with Verizon for offering its ESPN cable channel as an add-on to its new Custom TV FiOS package rather than as part of its basic tier. This morning ESPN filed a lawsuit alleging breech of contract.

Verizon earlier this month announced plans to offer the skinny bundle of content at $55 a month. The telco included some three dozen channels in its basic offering, adding other content “packs” for an additional $10 each. ESPN makes up the core of its “Sports Pack.”

In a statement ESPN said that it “is at the forefront of embracing innovative ways to deliver high-quality content and value to consumers on multiple platforms, but that must be done in compliance with our agreements. We simply ask that Verizon abide by the terms of our contracts.”

Verizon CFO Fran Shammo, during the company’s earnings call with analysts, put the ball squarely in ESPN and parent Disney’s court, saying it rolled out cheaper bundles because it was what consumers wanted.

"I think the right way to answer this without getting too public about our contractual situations –— look, this is a product that the consumer wants," Shammo said. "It’s all about consumer choice. I mean, if you look at the TV bundles today, most people only on average watch 17 channels. So this a way to give consumers what they want on a choice basis."

The suit against Verizon was filed Monday in New York Supreme Court. ESPN is seeking to stop Verizon from "unfairly depriving" it of "the benefits of its bargain."

An ESPN spokesperson told the Washington Post that the case wasn’t as much about money as it was about enforcing agreements and assuring that partners can’t “unilaterally change deals” without agreement from their partners.

Sling TV, which introduced its own slim bundle offering in February, reportedly negotiated with content owners for more than a year to hammer out agreements that allowed it to “bust bundles.” For the $20-a-month product.

The lawsuit creates an even more contentions environment for content owners and service providers, much of it being driven by rising content costs that have stretched operator budgets already hurt by cord cutting, competition and increased churn.

And, while ESPN is the first to throw a legal challenge at Verizon, it may not be the last. Both NBC and Fox say they, too, have issues with the way the Custom TV is being handled.

Stay tuned, this one will get ugly.

Follow me on Twitter @JimONeillMedia and on LinkedIn

READ THESE NEXT

Data? A growing, critical resource for the pay-TV and OTT industry
Pay TV, OTT, Big Data
Data? A growing, critical resource for the pay-TV and OTT industry
Jul 25 2017 5:15 AM

Earlier this year, a survey of pay-TV providers by the Pay-TV Innovation Forum 2017 found that the majority of pay-TV execs believed data and analytics will be critical to pay TV direction over the next five years.

SVOD, Pay TV, Millennials, Cord Cutting
Q2 likely to be miserable as operators brace for big customer losses; OTT anyone?
Jul 24 2017 3:00 PM

Could second quarter pay-TV subscriber losses in the United States top 1 million, the highest figure ever? In a word, yes.

The second quarter routinely is a weak one for operators and in the current environment – remember the first quarter saw more than 800,000 subscribers cut the cord, according to Kagan – reaching one million may be an easy task.

Pay TV, Live sports, Millennials
A skinny bundle without sports? Duh
May 25 2017 10:30 AM

Skinny bundles from cable operators – and their OTT surrogates like Sling TV – are becoming more common as the companies try to look more attractive to consumers tired of paying for 200-plus channels when they really only watch a dozen or less. Survey after survey has shown that subscribers are hungry for not just a slimmed down offering but also for the subscription savings smaller bundles would engender.

Pay TV, SVOD, Millennials
Is cord cutting over? Far from it, and that’s creating new OTT opportunities
Mar 16 2017 1:15 PM

Has cord cutting finally run its course among U.S. operators who have, over the past five years, watched millions of subscribers walk away from traditional pay-TV delivery? Are Millennials – and their following generation, Gen Edge – ready to join Gen X and Baby Boomers in tying themselves to arcane and expensive contracts that deliver bloated tiers of content that they have little interest in watching, let alone paying for?

Nope.